Sure, synonyms have lots of issues and choosing index vs. query is simply picking your poison, but it all depends on your app and your data and your user expectations, and you, the developer, have tools to moderate a lot of these issues.

Index-time synonyms have the problem (among others) that they cannot be changed without reindexing.

One technique is to simulate the query-time synonym filter expansion by having your app preprocess user queries to expand to the OR of the synonyms and then boost or de-boost the synonyms as makes sense for your app.

For example,

   (tv^0.5 OR television^2.5 OR "boob tube"^0.0001)

-- Jack Krupansky

-----Original Message----- From: Steve Rowe
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can a field with defined synonym be searched without the synonym?

Hmm, I've gotten this very wrong :) - DisjunctionMaxQuery will operate per-doc, so using it in the way I suggested will not allow for synonym IDF leveling across documents. Also, scoring obviously includes more factors than IDF.

On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:

But couldn't the IDF problem be fixed by applying the same IDF to all synonyms, e.g. via DisjunctionMaxQuery? (Maybe the ideal would be an average, not a max.)

(E)dismax applies this query per-field, but AFAICT there is nothing stopping anybody (modulo query parser construction :) ) from using it on synonyms in the same field.

Steve

On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:

Query parsers cannot fix the IDF problem or make query-time synonyms faster. Query synonym expansion makes more search terms. More search terms are more work at query time.

The IDF problem is real; I've run up against it. The most rare variant of the synonym have the highest score. This probably the opposite of what you want. For me, it was "TV" and "television". Documents with "TV" had higher scores than those with "television".

wunder

On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Chyla wrote:

@wunder
It is a misconception (well, supported by that wiki description) that the query time synonym filter have these problems. It is actually the default
parser, that is causing these problems. Look at this if you still think
that index time synonyms are cure for all:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4499

@joe
If you can use the flexible query parser (as linked in by @Swati) then all
you need to do is to define a different field with a different tokenizer
chain and then swap the field names before the analyzers processes the
document (and then rewrite the field name back - for example, we have
fields called "author" and "author_nosyn")

roman

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>wrote:

Query time synonyms have known problems. They are slower, cause incorrect
IDF, and don't work for phrase synonyms.

Apply synonyms at index time and you will have none of those problems.

See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory

wunder

On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Swati Swoboda wrote:

Query-time analyzers are still applied, even if you include a string in
quotes. Would you expect "foo" to not match "Foo" just because it's
enclosed in quotes?

Also look at this, someone who had similar requirements:

http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Synonym-Filter-disable-at-query-time-td2919876.html


-----Original Message-----
From: joe.cohe...@gmail.com [mailto:joe.cohe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can a field with defined synonym be searched without the
synonym?


I'm aplying only query-time synonym, so I have the original values
stored and indexed.
I would've expected that if I search a strin with quotations, i'll get
the exact match, without applying a synonym.

any way to achieve that?


Upayavira wrote
You can only search against terms that are stored in your index. If
you have applied index time synonyms, you can't remove them at query
time.

You can, however, use copyField to clone an incoming field to another
field that doesn't use synonyms, and search against that field instead.

Upayavira

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012, at 04:26 PM,

joe.cohen.m@

wrote:
Hi
I hava a field type without defined synonym.txt which retrieves both
records with "home" and "house" when I search either one of them.

I want to be able to search this field on the specific value that I
enter, without the synonym filter.

is it possible?

thanks.



--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-a-field-with-defined-synonym-b
e-searched-without-the-synonym-tp4026381.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-a-field-with-defined-synonym-be-searched-without-the-synonym-tp4026381p4026405.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org





--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org




Reply via email to