Hi Mark, I see no such issues in Solr 4.1. It seems to work fine.
Thanks. On 24 January 2013 03:58, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I don't know what you are seeing offhand. You might try Solr 4.1 and > see if it's something that has been resolved. > > - Mark > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Marcin Rzewucki <mrzewu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Guys, I pasted you the full log (see pastebin url). Yes, it is Solr4.0. 2 > > cores are in sync, but the 3rd one is not: > > INFO: PeerSync Recovery was not successful - trying replication. > core=ofac > > INFO: Starting Replication Recovery. core=ofac > > > > It started replication and even says it is done successfully: > > INFO: Replication Recovery was successful - registering as Active. > core=ofac > > > > but index files were not downloaded. It's empty, no docs. Also I do not > see > > "replication.properties" file. "tlog" dir is empty and "index" dir > contains > > only 3 files: segments.gen, segments_7 and write.lock > > It seems to be tough issue. Anyway, thanks for your help. > > > > > > On 23 January 2013 15:41, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Looks like it shows 3 cores start - 2 with versions that decide they are > >> up to date and one that replicates. The one that replicates doesn't have > >> much logging showing that activity. > >> > >> Is this Solr 4.0? > >> > >> - Mark > >> > >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> Mark, > >>> > >>> Take a peek in the pastebin url Marcin mentioned earlier > >>> (http://pastebin.com/qMC9kDvt) is there enough info there? > >>> > >>> Upayavira > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 02:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > >>>> Was your full logged stripped? You are right, we need more. Yes, the > >> peer > >>>> sync failed, but then you cut out all the important stuff about the > >>>> replication attempt that happens after. > >>>> > >>>> - Mark > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Marcin Rzewucki <mrzewu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> Previously, I took the lines related to collection I tested. Maybe > >> some interesting part was missing. I'm sending the full log this time. > >>>>> It ends up with: > >>>>> INFO: Finished recovery process. core=ofac > >>>>> > >>>>> The issue I described is related to collection called "ofac". I hope > >> the log is meaningful now. > >>>>> > >>>>> It is trying to do the replication, but it seems to not know which > >> files to download. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 23 January 2013 10:39, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>> the first stage is identifying whether it can sync with transaction > >>>>> logs. It couldn't, because there's no index. So the logs you have > shown > >>>>> make complete sense. It then says 'trying replication', which is > what I > >>>>> would expect, and the bit you are saying has failed. So the > interesting > >>>>> bit is likely immediately after the snippet you showed. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Upayavira > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 07:40 AM, Marcin Rzewucki wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> OK, so I did yet another test. I stopped solr, removed whole "data/" > >>>>> dir and started Solr again. Directories were recreated fine, but > >>>>> missing files were not downloaded from leader. Log is attached (I > >>>>> took the lines related to my test with 2 lines of context. I hope it > >>>>> helps.). I could find the following warning message: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Jan 23, 2013 7:16:08 AM org.apache.solr.update.PeerSync sync > >>>>> INFO: PeerSync: core=ofac url=http://<replica_host>:8983/solr START > >>>>> replicas=[http://<leader_host>:8983/solr/ofac/] nUpdates=100 > >>>>> Jan 23, 2013 7:16:08 AM org.apache.solr.update.PeerSync sync > >>>>> WARNING: no frame of reference to tell of we've missed updates > >>>>> Jan 23, 2013 7:16:08 AM org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy > >>>>> doRecovery > >>>>> INFO: PeerSync Recovery was not successful - trying replication. > >>>>> core=ofac > >>>>> > >>>>> So it did not know which files to download ?? Could you help me to > >>>>> solve this problem ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks in advance. > >>>>> Regards. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 22 January 2013 23:06, Yonik Seeley <[1]yo...@lucidworks.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Marcin Rzewucki > >>>>> <[2]mrzewu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Sorry, my mistake. I did 2 tests: in the 1st I removed just index > >>>>> directory > >>>>> > >>>>>> and in 2nd test I removed both index and tlog directory. Log lines > >>>>> I've > >>>>> > >>>>>> sent are related to the first case. So Solr could read tlog > directory > >>>>> in > >>>>> > >>>>>> that moment. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Anyway, do you have an idea why it did not download files from > leader > >>>>> ? > >>>>> > >>>>> For your 1st test, if you only deleted the index and not the > >>>>> > >>>>> transaction logs, Solr will look at the transaction logs to try and > >>>>> > >>>>> determine if it is up to date or not (by comparing with peers). > >>>>> > >>>>> If you want to clear out all the data, remove the entire data > >>>>> directory. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -Yonik > >>>>> > >>>>> [3]http://lucidworks.com > >>>>> > >>>>> References > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. mailto:yo...@lucidworks.com > >>>>> 2. mailto:mrzewu...@gmail.com > >>>>> 3. http://lucidworks.com/ > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
