Hi Barani, This identical question was posed at the same time on StackOverflow, and I answered it there already:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16407110/solr-4-2-solr-latlontype-type-v s-solr-spatialrecursiveprefixtreefieldtype/16409327#16409327 ~ David On 5/6/13 12:28 PM, "bbarani" <bbar...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I am currently using SOLR 4.2 to index geospatial data. I have configured >my >geospatial field as below. > > <fieldType name="location" class="solr.LatLonType" >subFieldSuffix="_coordinate"/> > > <field name="latlong" type="location" indexed="true" >stored="false" multiValued="true"/> > >I just want to make sure that I am using the correct SOLR class for >performing geospatial search since I am not sure which of the 2 >class(LatLonType vs SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType) will be >supported >by future versions of SOLR. > >I assume latlong is an upgraded version of >SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType, can someone please confirm if I am >right? > >Thanks, >Barani > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-LatLonType-type-vs-solr-SpatialRec >ursivePrefixTreeFieldType-tp4061113.html >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
