It would be beneficial. Lucene facets are really fast without caching and are what I call v2 since the drill sideways also adds capabilities.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Brendan Grainger < brendan.grain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jack, no urgency here. I'm unsure that it would even be > easy/beneficial to integrate into solr, but I'm definitely interested in > it. > > Brendan > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com > >wrote: > > > The topic has come up, but nobody has expressed a sense of urgency. > > > > It actually has a placeholder Jira: > > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SOLR-4774< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4774> > > > > Feel free to add your encouragement there. > > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Brendan Grainger > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:39 PM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Low Priority: Lucene Facets in Solr? > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > Not really a pressing need for this at all, but having worked through a > few > > tutorials, I was wondering if there was any work being done to > incorporate > > Lucene Facets into solr: > > > > http://lucene.apache.org/core/**4_3_0/facet/org/apache/lucene/** > > facet/doc-files/userguide.html< > http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/facet/org/apache/lucene/facet/doc-files/userguide.html > > > > > > Brendan > > > > > > -- > Brendan Grainger > www.kuripai.com > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
