Your correct, its not specifically for the update.chain. my mistake. thanks
msj On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>wrote: > Which section in the docs specifically? I thought it was multiple chains > per config file, but you had to choose your specific chain for individual > processors. > > I might be wrong though. > > Regards, > Alex. > > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, mike st. john <mstj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Alexandre, > > > > it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed > in > > the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make > > sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order > without > > the need to merge them into a single update processor definition. > > > > thanks > > msj > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch > > <arafa...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside > > the > > > chain, so why do you care about multiple chains? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Alex. > > > > > > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch > > > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at > > > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD > book) > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <mstj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > is it possible to have multiple run by default? > > > > > > > > i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the > UpdateRequestHandler > > > but > > > > it didn't seem to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > wondering if its even possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > msj > > > > > > > > > >
