This sounds interesting... Thanks guyz for the replies.. :)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > A while back I remember we notices some SPM users were having issues > with OpenJDK. Since then we've been recommending Oracle's > implementation to our Solr and to SPM users. At the same time, we > haven't seen any issues with OpenJDK in the last ~6 months. Oracle > JDK is not slow. :) > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/ > Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > On 9/30/2013 9:28 AM, Raheel Hasan wrote: > >> hmm why is that so? > >> Isnt Oracle's version a bit slow? > > > > For Java 6, the Sun JDK is the reference implementation. For Java 7, > > OpenJDK is the reference implementation. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_implementation > > > > I don't think Oracle's version could really be called slow. Sun > > invented Java. Sun open sourced Java. Oracle bought Sun. > > > > The Oracle implemetation is likely more conservative than some of the > > other implementations, like the one by IBM. The IBM implementation is > > pretty aggressive with optimization, so aggressive that Solr and Lucene > > have a history of revealing bugs that only exist in that implementation. > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > > -- Regards, Raheel Hasan
