Thanks all for your valuable inputs.
I looked at suggested solutions and I too feel, a* custom update
processor*during indexing will be the best solution to handle the
content field by
changing the value and storing it in another value.
Do I only need to change the below request handler to intercept all
indexing documents to perform my custom analysis during indexing? Or do I
need to change any other request handler also?
<requestHandler name="/update" class="solr.UpdateRequestHandler">
Thanks,
Dileepa
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>wrote:
> Any kind of cross-field processing is best done in an update processor.
> There are a lot of built-in update processors as well as a JavaScript
> script update processor.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Dileepa Jayakody
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:31 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Indexing a token to a different field in a custom filter
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> In my custom filter, I need to index the processed token into a different
> field. The processed token is a Stanbol enhancement response.
>
> The solution I have so far found is to use a Solr client (solj) to add a
> new Document with my processed field into Solr. Below is the sample code
> segment;
>
> SolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8983/solr/";);
> SolrInputDocument doc1 = new SolrInputDocument();
> doc1.addField( "id", "id1", 1.0f );
> doc1.addField("stanbolResponse", response);
> try {
> server.add(doc1);
> server.commit();
> } catch (SolrServerException e) {
> e.printStackTrace();
> }
>
>
> This mechanism requires a new HTTP call to the local Solr server for every
> token I process for the stanbolRequest field, and I feel it's not very
> efficient.
>
> Is there any other alternative way to invoke a update request to add a new
> field to the indexing document within the filter (without making an
> explicit HTTP call using Solrj)?
>
> Thanks,
> Dileepa
>
