Thanks a lot for the info Koji. I'm going through the source-code, to find out.
Regards, Dileepa On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Koji Sekiguchi <k...@r.email.ne.jp> wrote: > Hi Dileepa, > > The stanbolInterceptor processor chain will be used in multiple request >> handlers. Then I will have to pass the stanbol.enhancer.url param in each >> of those request handler which will cause redundant configurations. >> Therefore I need to pass the param to the processor directly. >> >> But when I pass the params to the Processor as below the parameter is not >> received to my ProcessorFactory class; >> <processor class="com.solr.stanbol.processor.StanbolContentProcessorFactor >> * >> >> <str name="stanbol.enhancer.url">http://localhost:8080/enhancer >> <http://localhost:8080/enhancer></str>* >> >> </processor> >> >> Can someone point out what might be wrong here? Can someone please advice >> on how to pass parameters directly to the Processor? >> > > I don't know why your Processor cannot get the parameters, but Processor > should > get them. For example, StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory can get > script > parameter like this: > > <processor class="solr.StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory"> > <str name="script">updateProcessor.js</str> > </processor> > > http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_0/solr-core/org/apache/ > solr/update/processor/StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory.html > > So why don't you consult the source code of > StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory, > etc? > > koji > -- > http://soleami.com/blog/automatically-acquiring-synonym-knowledge-from- > wikipedia.html >
