yutz Envoyé de mon iPhoneippj
Le 26 janv. 2014 à 06:13, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> a écrit : > There is no timestamp versioning as such in Solr but there is a new > document based versioning which will allow you to specify your own > (externally assigned) versions. > > See the "Document Centric Versioning Constraints" section at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents > > Sub-second soft auto commit can be expensive but it is hard to say if > it will be too expensive for your use-case. You must benchmark it > yourself. > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:51 PM, christopher palm <cpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have a scenario where the same SOLR document is being updated several >> times within a few ms of each other due to how the source system is sending >> in field updates on the document. >> >> The problem I am trying to solve is that the order of these updates isn’t >> guaranteed once the multi threaded SOLRJ client starts sending them to >> SOLR, and older updates are overlaying the newer updates on the same >> document. >> >> I would like to use a timestamp versioning so that the older document >> change won’t be sent into SOLR, but I didn’t see any automated way of doing >> this based on the document timestamp. >> >> Is there a good way to handle this scenario in SOLR 4.6? >> >> It seems that we would have to be soft auto committing with a subsecond >> level as well, is that even possible? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chris > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
