Hi Markus, SPDY does provide lower latency in the case when I have multiple requests to the same server/domain. It compresses the header and reduces the number of connections. But since it uses tls I am not sure if it will be faster than http 1.1. That is why I wanted to test SPDY with solr for inter shard communication. Currently, using http for communication to solr is slow.
Harsh > On 17-May-2014, at 9:44 am, "Markus Jelsma-2 [via Lucene]" > <ml-node+s472066n4136507...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > > Hi Harsh, > > > Does SPDY provide lower latency than HTTP/1.1 with KeepAlive or is it > encryption that you're after? > > > Markus > > > > -----Original message----- > From:harspras <[hidden email]> > Sent:Tue 13-05-2014 05:38 > Subject:Re: Solr + SPDY > To:[hidden email]; > Hi Vinay, > > I have been trying to setup a similar environment with SPDY being enabled > for Solr inter shard communication. Did you happen to have been able to do > it? I somehow cannot use SolrCloud with SPDY enabled in jetty. > > Regards, > Harsh Prasad > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4135377.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4136507.html > To unsubscribe from Solr + SPDY, click here. > NAML -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4136544.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
