Prosecan srpski glasac treba da cita ove izjave da bi se uverio kakve spteltke 
nepostojeca "medjunarodna zajednica" - EU plete Srbiji, pa da im bude zauvek 
jasno da clanstva Srbije u tzv EU nece biti - kao i da ce da nastave sa 
beskonacnim optuzivanjima Srbije za zlocine i sve ono sto je Zapad pocinio 
Srbima u ime demokratije. Zbog toga bi mozda trebalo glasati za "promene" i 
dati Nikolicu mandat predsednika Srbije. B.
=========
 http://www.iwpr.net/?p=tri&s=f&o=342028&apc_state=henh
New Chief Prosecutor, Fresh Approach?
Serge Brammertz may need to adopt new tactics to persuade Belgrade to hand over 
fugitives.
By Caroline Tosh in London (TU No 534, 18-Jan-08)
In his first public statement as chief prosecutor at Yugoslav tribunal in The 
Hague, Serge Brammertz this week set out how he would fulfil his mandate before 
the court closes in three years’ time.

An “absolute priority”, he said, was bringing the remaining four fugitives – 
particularly Bosnian Serb army commander General Ratko Mladic and wartime 
political leader Radovan Karadzic - to face trial in The Hague. 

Brammertz, who at the beginning of January was appointed chief prosecutor of 
the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, ICTY, said that 
in the coming weeks he planned to discuss the issue of cooperation with the 
tribunal in talks with the authorities in the former Yugoslav republics and 
with representatives of other countries and international organisations, 
including the European Union.

His predecessor, the fiery Swiss lawyer Carla Del Ponte, was instrumental in 
linking Serbia’s hopes of accession to the EU with cooperation with the 
tribunal, and her use of media pressure against the Balkans is credited with 
bringing dozens of fugitives to the Hague tribunal.

But observers say that while the promise of EU membership had leverage in the 
past, it is no longer the carrot and stick it once was in securing Serbian 
cooperation.

The EU is showing signs of giving Serbia an easier path to EU membership. Its 
Slovenian presidency is eager to sign a Stabilisation and Accession Agreement, 
SAA, with Serbia – a precursor to future membership negotiations. 

This would not only keep Serbia closer to Europe, but would also boost the 
moderate president Boris Tadic’s chances against radical challenger Tomislav 
Nikolic in the upcoming presidential elections. 

"Full cooperation [with the tribunal] is one of the conditions [for the signing 
of the SAA.] The problem is how we decide [what full cooperation is]," said 
Slovenian foreign minister Dimitrij Rupel in an agency report published on 
January 8. 

Meanwhile, ongoing debate over Kosovo’s future and the imminent elections means 
that cooperation with the ICTY is low on Belgrade’s list of priorities.

In recent months, Serbian prime minister Vojislav Kostunica has been growing 
closer to Moscow, and the European Commission has expressed concern at Russian 
energy giant Gazprom’s controversial takeover bid for Serbia's oil monopoly. 

Kostunica has also warned that the SAA will be annulled if the EU carries out 
its plan to send a “civil mission” of administrators and police to support 
Kosovo once, as is expected, it becomes independent next month.

Although Serbia seems to be turning away from Europe, James Lyon of the 
International Crisis Group believes the EU still has the power to force 
Belgrade to hand over Karadzic and Mladic.

“The EU and international community have shown that conditioning progress on EU 
integration has worked with Serbia,” he said. “We have a proven track record of 
this.

“If enough pressure is put on Serbia, the [authorities] will arrest Mladic.”

While Kostunica has no desire to join the EU, he cannot ignore the fact that 
domestic opinion polls show consistently high public support for European 
integration. 

However, Lyon is concerned that the EU is currently trying to do a deal where 
Serbia would get membership in return for a “soft no” on Kosovo, meaning that 
Belgrade should effectively accept independence while continuing to object to 
it in principle.

“The problem with this is Serbia isn't going to do it – they will not trade 
Kosovo for EU membership. Brussels just doesn't seem to get it,” said Lyon. 

Political and economic analyst Braca Grubacic thinks that the only way the 
remaining fugitives will end up in The Hague is if Brussels keeps up its 
demands for full cooperation from Serbia.

At the moment, however, EU members have other things on their minds.

“Most European countries are now more focused on what will happen with Kosovo’s 
status and the European Mission in Kosovo, and what will be the result of the 
Serbian presidential elections, and the ICTY is marginalised on the issue,” 
said Grubacic.

According to the analyst, while “everybody knows Mladic is in Serbia, the 
current government at this moment is absolutely not doing much on chasing after 
[him] and there is no serious pressure from European Union to do it”.

Dr Jonathan Eyal, director of international security studies at the Royal 
United Services Institute, said that at present, the EU had little leverage in 
pushing Serbia to deliver the men.

“I do not believe that EU membership as such, at this particular moment, has 
much influence in general, over Serbian politics,” he said.

“I think that the reality is that in Serbia itself, the whole issue [of 
membership] is now related directly to Kosovo, and the rather offhand dismissal 
by Mr Kostunica of what he calls trade-off between EU membership and the loss 
of Kosovo has transformed the debate.”

So how should the new chief prosecutor proceed in persuading Serbia to hand 
over the suspects?

Lyon argues that it is vital for Brammertz to maintain Del Ponte’s policy of 
pressing the EU to insist that Serbia hands over the remaining fugitives before 
it can join. 

Experience shows that when the EU softens its stance, this only leads to 
reduced cooperation from Belgrade, he argues. “The minute [the EU] backs down 
and start to show flexibility towards Serbia, Serbia stops all cooperation, and 
we see this time and again,” he said.

Lyon dismissed any suggestion that discussions over the fugitives be shelved 
until the Kosovo’s future is settled, pointing out with a 2010 deadline looming 
for the tribunal to finish its work, the pressure is on.

He argues that as long as Karadzic and Mladic continue to evade justice, the 
possibility of further conflict in the Balkans remains.

“The wars in the Balkans will not end until these people are brought to 
justice,” he said. 

“If we put off these guys’ arrests, we need to be aware that there will be 
renewed ethnic cleansing and violence, and no EU membership is going to be able 
to patch that up.” 

But according to Eyal, it is unrealistic to expect Belgrade to hand over the 
men while its pride is freshly bruised over the loss of Kosovo.

Brammertz may just have to accept that Serbian cooperation is unlikely for the 
time being. “The prosecutor will have to take the long view,” said Eyal. 
“Nobody is in a position to accept de facto the loss of Kosovo and say, ‘And, 
by the way, we are now also handing over war criminals to The Hague’.”

But waiting for the dust to settle over Kosovo carries its own risks.

Grubacic suggested Brussels could eventually drop its demands for Serbia to 
turn over the suspects as a way of somehow compensating it for the loss of the 
province.

“I think that if Kosovo becomes independent and is recognised by European 
countries and United States, in a way EU and the others will be ready to kind 
of turn a blind eye on cooperation with ICTY because they don’t want to punish 
so much Serbs after all this time,” he said.

Grubacic believes it should be a priority for Brammertz over the coming months 
to retain the political backing of European governments, and keep the issue of 
cooperation with the tribunal on the agenda.

“Although, for the moment, everyone [in Europe] seems to be behind this issue, 
it is possible to envisage a decision to turn a blind eye [to Serbia’s failure 
to yield the fugitives] in return for a normalisation of relations between 
Europe and Serbia after the storm over Kosovo is over,” said Eyal.

In addition to engaging European heads of state, the new chief prosecutor might 
also find that negotiating with Serbia behind the scenes rather than publicly 
applying pressure could yield greater results.

The choice of Belgian lawyer Brammertz as Del Ponte’s successor has led many to 
suggest that UN officials saw a need for a change of tack in the tribunal’s 
negotiations with Serbia. 

Brammertz, a former deputy prosecutor at the International Criminal Court who 
also led an international investigation into murder of former Lebanese prime 
minister Rafiq Hariri, is known for working quietly behind the scenes, rather 
than in the full glare of the media spotlight.

During her eight-year tenure, observers questioned Del Ponte’s grasp of the 
political situation in Serbia, and argued that her public attempts to pressure 
the Balkans countries into submission at times appeared counterproductive.

In a comment piece on the website of Belgrade-based radio station B92 on 
January 6, a former United States ambassador to Croatia and Serbia, William 
Montgomery, argued that Del Ponte's “bull in the china shop attitude towards 
the fragile democratic governments in the region… actually made it harder, 
rather than easier to transfer indictees to The Hague”.

Eyal accepts that on certain occasions, the timing of Del Ponte’s statements 
was off. 

“I’m not saying that we have to accept the Serbian position; I’m merely saying 
that you’re not advancing your case a great deal by coming in the middle of an 
electoral campaign and threatening eternal isolation unless the Serbs comply 
immediately [with the tribunal].” 

There is a view that a lower-key, more diplomatic approach could be more 
effective. 

“There was somehow a feeling with Ms Del Ponte that any sort of confidential, 
secret negotiations were somehow dirty and compromising the tribunal,” said 
Eyal. “At the end of the day, we have to admit that there is a large political 
element in any tribunal that relates to war crimes.”

The analyst acknowledged that while private negotiations could lead to certain 
concessions being agreed - such as safeguards, plea bargains or other terms - 
in exchange for the delivery of the fugitives, they were vital in making 
progress.

“While there is a danger in negotiating behind the scenes, I see this is the 
only way for handing these people over.”

Caroline Tosh is an IWPR editor in London.


      Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane with All new 
Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.ca

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



===============
Group Moderator: [Е-ПОШТА 
ЗАШТИЋЕНА] 
page at http://magazine.sorabia.net
for more informations about current situation in Serbia http://www.sorabia.net 
Slusajte GLAS SORABIJE nas talk internet-radio (Serbian Only)
http://radio.sorabia.net
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;] 
    mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Одговори путем е-поште