Right...As if they (Sakashvili and Tadic) were cloned by Frankenstein, both with a wrong (inadequate) brain.
DV --- In sorabia@yahoogroups.com, Boba <[Е-ПОШТА ЗАШТИЋЕНА]> wrote: > > An Excellent aticle. > Serbia's president Boris Tadic and Georgia's Saakashvili , it seems, are the same person!! > ..." Saakashvili's personality invites a comparison with an aggressive orangutan heavily fed with bananas and taught to attack strangers. He came to believe sincerely that he had become a key player in the global politics and enjoyed the support of the world's number one country. His brain was not big enough to appreciate the sophistication of his boss's political wisdom, and he loyally obeyed the trainer's commands having no idea what finale loomed ahead. ..." > Also, Gorgians must be close relatives of Kosovo Albanians : > ..." The statement actually makes little sense. In reality, "the prominent and cultured Georgian nation" is no less infected with Nazism than "the prominent and cultured German nation" used to be in its darkest epoch. It would take a Denazification in Georgia, a process that would also encompass a De-Americanization, to make friendship with the Georgian nation possible. At the moment, the majority of Georgians hates Russia, and it is nor Russia's fault that Georgians fell so easily to Washington's dirty propaganda." > > > http://en.fondsk.ru/article.php?id=1540 > > 12.08.2008 > Dmitriy SEDOV > The Moment of Truth > Leaving Tbilisi, C. Rice probably smiled broadly at the Georgian still-President. She must have thought: "Poor nice guy". Perhaps she even cried as the plane was taking off she had just signed her Georgian friend's sentence. Well, the laws of the US politics have no mercy to individuals in general and to tamed apes in particular. In the meantime, the still-President, inspired by the promises he heard from Condoleezza, launched urgent preparations for an attack on South Ossetia. Troops soldiers, tanks, mobile hospitals and mortuaries - started moving towards the security zone. It seems that he was sincerely unaware that a political death sentence had been handed out to him and was soaping the rope for himself with his own hands. > He is too young and his credulity is still uninfluenced by experience. It just did not occur to him that the US needed his help to do something quite tricky to drag Georgia into NATO without destroying the existing structure of relations with Russia. Washington was quick to realize that Moscow would struggle to retain its historical positions as much as it can and that the objective cannot be accomplished noiselessly. Saakashvili did not suspect that from the start he was appointed to play the role of a kamikaze with a mission to blow up the whole situation and transform it into something totally new. This was the reason why weapons were fed massively to Georgia since the very first days of the Rose Revolution and why it was being directly conditioned for a war. Saakashvili's personality invites a comparison with an aggressive orangutan heavily fed with bananas and taught to attack strangers. He came to believe sincerely that he had become a key > player in the global politics and enjoyed the support of the world's number one country. His brain was not big enough to appreciate the sophistication of his boss's political wisdom, and he loyally obeyed the trainer's commands having no idea what finale loomed ahead. > The US stopped believing in a peaceful integration of Abkhazia and South Ossetia into Georgia a long time ago. It was understood in the US very well that the defiant Republics would never agree to the option, nor would Moscow let them do it. As a result, the US spent four years working towards an urgent solution. The idea was that a kamikaze President was to launch an aggression against Tskhinvali, thus triggering Russia's response, and get defeated by the "evil empire". The outcome would warrant the admission of the tiny Georgia to NATO without unnecessary formalities like a membership plan. Under the scenario, a leak of information concerning Saakashvili's actual role will be impossible to prevent, and some of the Europeans would rather not see him in their company. That is a serious circumstance for Mr. Saakashvili. The genocide facts will inevitably become broadly known, and he will be a figure unfit to lead Georgia to NATO. He will have to > be replaced. The task is easy to accomplish the small and defenseless Georgia will remain on the alliance's agenda while Saakashvili, who as the US Department of State will put it is partially guilty, will be eliminated by one shot in the back of the head or inhale emissions from a heater at the apartment of one of his girlfriends, as it has happened to Georgian politicians in the past. The compromised orang-outang with small brain will present a problem to his trainers, he will be able to reveal shocking details of his work for them, and, generally, he will be a disturbance. It will make sense to silence him forever, especially as the corresponding methods are nothing new. > It appears that the US has drawn up a realistic plan of a war to the last Georgian soldier. Since Russia has no intention to spread the military operation beyond the security zone and is going to limit its activity in the Georgian territory to surgical airstrikes, the results of the US preparations for Georgia's NATO membership will remain unaffected. Those are > - The population's anti-Russian sentiment; > - The vehemently anti-Russian and pro-US ruling elite; > - The infrastructure which is practically ready to host the US troops; > - The "global public opinion" outraged as a result of an anti-Russian campaign. > Everything is ready. The time to withdraw troops and to open negotiations will come after the active phase of the process. The need to protect Georgia and to admit it to NATO urgently will be invoked, and the ascension of a more moderate figure than Saakashvili to the Georgian Presidency will reassure Moscow which will need a lot of time to recover after a global smear campaign. > There is a problem with the plan, though. In its framework, Georgia undoubtedly loses not only South Ossetia but also Abkhazia. Thus Russia is offered an exchange: it gets the two de-facto Republics while NATO gets Georgia. Even though for Georgia the amputation of Abkhazia means the loss of access to a segment of the Black Sea coast desired by NATO generals, there still remains Ajaria with the Batumi seaport. Combined with the Sevastopol naval base in Ukraine, which is currently leased by Russia but will eventually fall into the hands of the US as well, this is enough to encircle the Russian navy. > At the moment, the US is interested in the escalation of hostilities in Georgia as this is the quickest way to reinstate the concept of Russia as the "evil empire" in the West. Currently, this is the US top priority in case Russia manages to break the informational blockade, to demonstrate the real situation in the conflict zone to the world, and to expose those openly and implicitly responsible for the massacre, Georgia's chances to get a pass to NATO would shrink. Therefore, the show must go on! The Western media cannot be expected to be objective and unbiased this is not their function. Rather, it is likely that Russian President D. Medvedev similarly to Yugoslavian President S. Milosevic - will be branded the butcher of Tskhinvali. > The US plan is nearly error-free. Only a slight mistake has been made it should be taken into account that traits occasionally surface in the Russian character for which Russians are likened to an awakened bear. What if Russians are not going to agree to the scenario which is already understood by the Kremlin? Georgia's tremendous vulnerability stems from the fact that it is a Republic based on the discrimination against all the nations other than Georgians. As a result, it can collapse momentarily, for example, in case the Abkhazians extend assistance to other nations which are no less eager to be independent. What if they will? We would be more than happy should this happen. We would hate to see an apery breeding ferocious orang-outangs set up in the Caucasus. > > Post Scriptum > > One often hears that "the prominent and cultured Georgian nation" must not be equated with the criminal clique which has seized power in Georgia. The statement actually makes little sense. In reality, "the prominent and cultured Georgian nation" is no less infected with Nazism than "the prominent and cultured German nation" used to be in its darkest epoch. It would take a Denazification in Georgia, a process that would also encompass a De-Americanization, to make friendship with the Georgian nation possible. At the moment, the majority of Georgians hates Russia, and it is nor Russia's fault that Georgians fell so easily to Washington's dirty propaganda. > Post a comment > Hide form > Âàøå ñîîáùåíèå íà ñàéòå ïîÿâèòñÿ ÷åðåç íåêîòîðîå âðåìÿ, ïîñëå îáíîâëåíèÿ ñòðàíèöû. > > Êîììåíòàðèè, ñîäåðæàùèå íåíîðìàòèâíóþ ëåêñèêó èëè îñêîðáèòåëüíûå ðåïëèêè, áóäóò óäàëåíû ìîäåðàòîðîì > > Òåìà > Àâòîð > Email > Òåêñò > Show all comments (2) > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now at > http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
