On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 07:51:41AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote: >> Document that drm(4) needs agp(4). Bump date. >> (joerg said so, and compilation fails without.) > > I really hate to contradict joerg, but... > > I think this is incorrect. You can compile drm with DRM_NO_AGP and it > will compile just fine. I'm running 5 machines like that! (I thought > that I'd posted something relevant on current-users recently (a couple > weeks or so ago), but can't find it right now.) > > So really should simply document the option DRM_NO_AGP rather than > telling folks to include unnecessary drivers!
Shouldn't it compile without AGP based on whether AGP is configured rather than having its own additional option? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org