In message: <20090511015855.gd16...@britannica.bec.de>
Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> writes:
: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:51:41PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > I've missed much of the discussion, can someone recap exactly what
: > you'd like to see changed? That would be the starting point for any
: > user-visisble changes to FreeBSD...
:
: There is currently a mixed naming convention when refering to FFS
: filesystems (v1 and v2). Sometimes, it is FFS, FFS2, UFS, UFS2 etc.
: The consensus in NetBSD was to consistently use FFS and FFSv2.
: UFS2 is bad, as it changes the underlaying inode format, but still has
: FFS on top.
Right, I gleaned that from the discussion.
What I didn't glean from the discussion is what, exactly, you were
going to do about it and what, exactly, you'd like to harmonize with
FreeBSD on. It may have been there, but I just missed it.
Warner
