In message: <20090511015855.gd16...@britannica.bec.de> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> writes: : On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:51:41PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > I've missed much of the discussion, can someone recap exactly what : > you'd like to see changed? That would be the starting point for any : > user-visisble changes to FreeBSD... : : There is currently a mixed naming convention when refering to FFS : filesystems (v1 and v2). Sometimes, it is FFS, FFS2, UFS, UFS2 etc. : The consensus in NetBSD was to consistently use FFS and FFSv2. : UFS2 is bad, as it changes the underlaying inode format, but still has : FFS on top.
Right, I gleaned that from the discussion. What I didn't glean from the discussion is what, exactly, you were going to do about it and what, exactly, you'd like to harmonize with FreeBSD on. It may have been there, but I just missed it. Warner