On Fri, 25 Dec 2009, Elad Efrat wrote:
> >> enum {
> >> - KAUTH_GENERIC_CANSEE=1,
> >> - KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER
> >> + KAUTH_GENERIC_UNUSED1=1,
> >> + KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER,
> >
> > This change renumbers KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER from 2 to 1. Was that
> > intentional?
>
> My C is rusty, if KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER is 1, what is KAUTH_GENERIC_UNUSED1?Sorry, I misread the diff. I thought that the "=1" had been removed, which would have made KAUTH_GENERIC_UNUSED1 zero. --apb (Alan Barrett)
