In message: <20100615052154.gb16...@netbsd.org>
David Holland <dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org> writes:
: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:40:37AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > On i386, that's true. amd64 expands to '0', as does sun3. This makes
: > the first one true. The second one, i386 expands to '1', so the
: > second one would be false.
:
: Arguably we shouhld fix our gcc to only define "__i386__", not "i386",
: which conflicts with the user namespace...
True, but doing so would likely break applications that have depended
on this define. Which is worse?
Warner
