In article <20100930133211.gc25...@britannica.bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: >For the record, I objected this alternative to my earlier patch because >it once again buries the Alpha madness deeply inside MD headers. This is >just asking to recreate the problem the next time someone wants to deal >with the symbol table hash and there is still no real indication of >Alpha being the odd man out.
The alternatives are to: - leave it as is - break backwards compatibility in the binaries - handle both formats Which one? christos
