On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:52:57PM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > 1) There is a use-after-free. Hint: TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(). > > 2) It is not safe; while lock is dropped, the 'next' entry may also > be removed and freed. Hint: have a local list and avoid relocking.
Hmm. 2) implies that the whole sysmon_taskq(9) is not safe? - Jukka. PS. It is crazy to have "safe" and "unsafe" variants of these macros.
