On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:07:08PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote: > Regarding this (which I have discussed with Marc off-list previously), I > think a Lua module should always depend on liblua.so as there will be > calls to functions from there, though I guess Marc is correct that the > binary loading the module should have been linked with it anyway.
It can make a difference in the order libraries are scanned. As such, explicitly linking is going to be faster and more robust. Joerg