On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:39:44PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
>
> [email protected] said:
> > alloc/free here for whatever is using a lot of memory would be much
> > better than increasing the minimum each LWP requires.
>
> Agreed. In the ppbattach case, it should be sufficient
> to put the devinfo printf into a separate function, so
> that it doesn't stack up when called recursively. (One
> just needs to make sure that the compiler doesn't
> inline it again.)
Recursion in the kernel?
Isn't that really frowned upon itself?
David
--
David Laight: [email protected]
