On Feb 19, 6:43am, [email protected] (matthew green) wrote: -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/crash
| | > I thought arm works. I am fixing mvme68k now. I am trying to make things | > work without the kludge that is why I left it broken. | | can you please not do this? ie, don't commit broken code and leave | the tree broken for random ports for some time. if you see a break | that isn't trivial to fix, please just revert your change. I have fixed everything already. While I have built all the toolchains and it is easy for me to build one arch at the time I don't have the space to build all. | (i'm not even convinced that making crash/Makefile "clean" is worth | all the code churn involved, espcially with cvs as our back end that | doesn't cope well with moved files.) It is not much churn at all; crash uses a small subset of db_interface.c and it is not worth it ifdef'ing it all over the place and not understanding what gets compiled or not. | it's really annoying when you try to build netbsd and it doesn't | for these sorts of reasons. i've wasted a bunch of hours just in | the last week dealing with failed build points when trying to | binary search a failure point. It was just broken for 2 days, because I could not get build results quicker. christos
