On 28 March 2012 07:53, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, > Valeriy E. Ushakov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>But that is not what the code was. The code was: >> >> char c; if (c == CHAR_MAX) ... >> >>and *that* is portable. As I said in another mail to thsi thread that >>went unanswered, it is literally schizophrenic of lint to complain >>about it. > > How can lint know that if (c == 255) is portable? Because CHAR_MAX > gets expanded by cpp to 255 before lint parses the file. >
(How) does the compiler (not) catch this one ? -- ~Cherry
