On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
+ATF_TC_BODY(random_zero, tc)
+{
+ const size_t n = 1000000;
+ size_t i, j;
+ long x;
+
+ srandom(0);
+
+ for (i = j = 0; i < n; i++) {
+
+ if ((x = random()) == 0)
+ j++;
+ }
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE(j != n);
+}
n=4 would probably be enough iterations, and I'd suggest checking
whether all values are the same as each other, rather than
checking whether all values are zero.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
From: Alan Barrett <a...@cequrux.com>
To: source-changes-d@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: CVS commit: src
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20120328103358.4bb3317...@cvs.netbsd.org>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
+ATF_TC_BODY(random_zero, tc)
+{
+ const size_t n = 1000000;
+ size_t i, j;
+ long x;
+
+ srandom(0);
+
+ for (i = j = 0; i < n; i++) {
+
+ if ((x = random()) == 0)
+ j++;
+ }
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE(j != n);
+}
n=4 would probably be enough iterations, and I'd suggest requiring all
values to be different, rather than requiring at least one non-zero
value.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
