In article <20120703163503.4334298...@pluto.mumble.net>, Taylor R Campbell <riastr...@netbsd.org> wrote: > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 05:49:06 +0000 > From: David Holland <dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org> > > erm... sys/types.h is supposed to be first. > > and, as sys/param.h includes sys/types.h, normally one should not use > both. > >Well, foo. I was just doing what christos suggested. I am generally >very leery of relying on transitive inclusion, but whatever is the >right rule, can we have it written down here?
It does not really matter, since the only system where <sys/param.h> needed to be included before <sys/types.h> (I even forget why) was 4.2BSD and this has long been retired. christos
