In article <[email protected]>, Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 05:49:06 +0000 > From: David Holland <[email protected]> > > erm... sys/types.h is supposed to be first. > > and, as sys/param.h includes sys/types.h, normally one should not use > both. > >Well, foo. I was just doing what christos suggested. I am generally >very leery of relying on transitive inclusion, but whatever is the >right rule, can we have it written down here?
It does not really matter, since the only system where <sys/param.h> needed to be included before <sys/types.h> (I even forget why) was 4.2BSD and this has long been retired. christos
