On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:53:24AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > While we're making sure to free() things, should we not also defend > against memory leaks in the case where an option is used more than once?
While we are here, I wonder why sysmon(9) does not follow the common guidelines w.r.t. for instance queue(3). I know quite well that none of this is your making, but smalll refactorings like this could make the code more understandable to other people. - Jukka.
