On Nov 11, 12:30pm, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: } On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:17:54AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote: } > } x86_wbind()? Which however appears to be (icorrectly?) #ifndef'd for Xen. } > } > Uh, the function for Xen would be wbinvd(), which would create } > a very nice infinite loop as all that function does is call } > xpq_flush_cache(). This change was fully discussed on tech-xen@.
Oops, that should be port-xen@ } My point kind of was that why not fix the trivial function for Xen instead } of a direct asm() call? My point is, if you want to know, go read the thread in port-xen@, or the code. Also, what "trivial function for Xen"? }-- End of excerpt from Jukka Ruohonen