On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:34:59PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:31:58PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > > Why does lsof define _KERNEL ? > > Let me rephrase: we provide the userland important stuff when either _KERNEL > or MAKEFS is defined - maybe MAKEFS should be renamed and lsof could use the > new define instead of _KERNEL. > > MSDOSFS_MOUNT_USERLAND_DEFS or something.
lsof inherently want to mess with the kernel details, i.e. to try to rediscover the original path name used to open a file etc. Joerg
