> On Oct 29, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com> wrote: > > On Oct 30, 11:14am, uebay...@gmail.com (Masao Uebayashi) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/config > > | Could you show me an example failure senario? What do you propose instead? > > I don't have anything *better* to propose. I think mach-o constructors > are different. > > | I heard that rump fixed linkset problem using .ctors/.dtors. > | > | But .ctors/.dtors in kernel is just analogy of the userland one; it > | may use the same section names but the internal behavior can be > | defferent. > > Sure, I am not sure that all the object formats support them though.
arm doesn’t use .ctors/.dtors it has init/fini array instead. and where would they be executed?
