On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 06:57:52PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > OK. __foo50 for what was introduced in 6.0 always seemed silly to me, > but every example I found was done that way.
My understanding always was that the __foo${N} matches the COMPAT_${N}
needed for the old code (however silly that looks now).
Martin
