On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:32:58AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:17:27AM +0100, Pierre Pronchery wrote: > > The automatic approach is great because we don't want reproducible > > builds only for releases. It can be documented for releases regardless. > > The automatic aproach relies on local file times in your source tree. > I don't see how that can usefully work if you want to reproduce a build > on a different machine later.
Especially since the time stamps will be different for "cvs up" vs "fresh cvs co". Joerg
