In article <20170824171856.11a6ef...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Robert Elz <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: kre
>Date: Thu Aug 24 17:18:55 UTC 2017
>
>Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: subr_extent.c
>
>Log Message:
>Build fix attempt ... changes affect !KERNEL (ie: userland, rump) version
>of this file only.
>
>Rather than adding meaningless {} around all uses of functions that
>are #defined to nothing for userland, #define the funcs to something
>that is functionally equivalent (but which appeases gcc).
Doesn't __nothing work?
christos
