Maxime Villard wrote: > In case you didn't notice, this sysctl results directly from the answers I > got, and is not my original plan (about which I changed my mind as a > consequence of the conversation). So now tell me exactly which point I didn't > consider and which reply I ignored. The thread is here?[1], go ahead, I'm > watching you. > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=netbsd-tech-kern&m=149071535930695&w=2
Some people (including me) wanted more granular control. Your sysctl doesn't give such control. -- Alex