Maxime Villard wrote:
> In case you didn't notice, this sysctl results directly from the answers I
> got, and is not my original plan (about which I changed my mind as a
> consequence of the conversation). So now tell me exactly which point I didn't
> consider and which reply I ignored. The thread is here?[1], go ahead, I'm
> watching you.
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=netbsd-tech-kern&m=149071535930695&w=2

Some people (including me) wanted more granular control. Your sysctl
doesn't give such control.

-- 
Alex

Reply via email to