On 17/01/2018 01:57, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 06:35:08PM -0600, David Young wrote:
I have said it before, that I do think the "concept architecture" of
802.11 VAP is rather broken, but let's be honest: nobody, especially not
I, have had the time in 10+ years to independently implement anything
comparable. *shrug*
What is your issue with VAPs?
My main beef with early VAP implementations is that the user had to
create a VAP from the physical interface/radio just to get client
association working.
Thankfully those days have now passed it seems.
But frankly it's just easier to get another interface/radio.
Roy
