On 03/03/18 02:06, matthew green wrote:
> you didn't grep enough :-) eg:
>
> dist/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c: prefix = (sel & SAVRES_SAVE) ?
> "_savegpr_" : "_restgpr_";
>
> is the part that matters.
Just so I understand, where does this come into play from the bootxx
side, reason I ask is there is no noise in the build output. bootxx
compiles without warnings or complaint (I haven't touched the verbosity
settings). Would problems with this binary be expected on execution &
not during build?
> i don't know you can easily test it. i would recommend
> putting the old code back for ${HAVE_GCC:U0} > 0 builds.
Like so?
Index: sys/arch/macppc/stand/bootxx/Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/macppc/stand/bootxx/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 Makefile
--- sys/arch/macppc/stand/bootxx/Makefile 2 Mar 2018 23:15:25
-0000 1.18
+++ sys/arch/macppc/stand/bootxx/Makefile 3 Mar 2018 03:22:09 -0000
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ CLEANFILES+= ${PROG}.sym
${PROG}: ${OBJS}
${_MKTARGET_LINK}
+.if ${HAVE_GCC:U0} > 0
+ ${LD} -o ${.TARGET}.sym ${LINKFLAGS} ${OBJS}
${DESTDIR}/usr/lib/libgcc.a
+.else
+ ${LD} -o ${.TARGET}.sym ${LINKFLAGS} ${OBJS}
+.endif
${LD} -o ${.TARGET}.sym ${LINKFLAGS} ${OBJS}
${OBJCOPY} -O binary ${.TARGET}.sym ${.TARGET}
