On Sun, 18 Mar 2018, Paul Goyette wrote:
These look wrong:
-compat_60_fini(void)
+compat_60_fini()
Fixed. Thanks for catching. Now I gotta figure out why this didn't
get compiled!
They actually did get build, so I guess gcc didn't mind the missing
(void) in the function definiiton.
Maybe we're not building modules with a sufficiently high WARNS=n ?
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+