Le 06/12/2018 à 07:35, Taylor R Campbell a écrit :
So please try again, maxv. Your last message was incredibly disrespectful to other members of the project who have spent decades with NetBSD doing debugging and diagnostics with tools your changes broke.
Oh yeah? Let's talk disrespect: - I developed the strongest KASLR implementation ever, and the only thing I'm told now is that enabling it is a "bug". - I discussed the issue of leaky sysctls a fews months ago, I identified these sysctls, I made a TODO list about that, I repeated several times that I would plug them, it was agreed to achieve that by limiting access to root only, and I even added it as a blocker for NetBSD-9. After all of that, someone comes in and reverts my changes with no discussion whatsoever. All the issues I marked as "done" suddenly have to be re-fixed differently again by me. - I am now personally accused by several people of breaking their systems: "you did that", "you've broken my ability", and so on. These changes were discussed, and in real life it's supposed to mean that there is a shared responsibility. Yet all of a sudden, the fingers are pointed at me, in the most ridiculous way possible. The truth is, in the end it _is_ legitimate to change the fix, and re-discuss it all in order to not break fstat and friends. But far from doing that, you are literally all trying to prevent any fix; by reverting changes without discussion as if none had been held beforehand, by accusing me while it was agreed upon, by saying that I'm really dumb to send the email to devs as if the conversation hadn't been held there earlier with no audience problem whatsoever, by saying that I don't want people's opinion in a thread where I was precisely _asking_ people's opinion, by suggesting that I'm not happy with the conclusion of previous discussions while it's so glaringly obvious that I actually _agreed_ with the previous conclusion, and so on. Overall, I don't see a lot of honesty, or even respect, in all of your answers. I will thank Christos for committing something that does improve the situation from a technical PoV. At least, one thing was done. And it also shows that there is no point discussing.