In article <[email protected]>, matthew green <[email protected]> wrote: >"Christos Zoulas" writes: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By: christos >> Date: Tue Feb 19 00:30:16 UTC 2019 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/i915: intel_ddi.c intel_display.c >> intel_sdvo.c >> src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/nouveau: nouveau_bo.c >> >> Log Message: >> revert the upsteam portion of previous; we don't want to patch upstream >> fallthrough/breaks. > >FWIW, fixes that are for *bugs* i think we should commit to our >tree -- eg, missing break that actually matters. the tough part >is knowing which ones are actually bugs! > >_some_ of the ones you've posted about seem like real bugs, and >who knows, maybe they fix some odd issue in nouveau ;)
I kept the one that was clearly a bug. The nouveau ones and the atheros ones are not clear... christos
