On 2020/02/18 6:55, Andrew Doran wrote:
I corrected the cpu_ast() case. Yes it's curious why ibm4xx calls mi_userret() directly; that seems wrong (I have not changed it though). I think it definitely makes more sense to deal with OWEUPC before userret().
Thank you! Now, I'm working on fixing ibm4xx. IMO, there's no reason to use mi_userret() here, and I will commit a fix later with other commits. Thanks, rin
