On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:22 AM Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > > J. Hannken-Illjes <hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de> writes: > > >> Forgot to add in the commit log, the changes have been pulled in from > >> upstream openzfs. > >> > >> https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/928e8ad47d3478a3d5d01f0dd6ae74a9371af65e#diff-9fd6b453f8153161abe0728c449e6505R4386 > > > > This is NOT our upstream -- >
For the sake of completeness, the upstream issue was discussed in a private thread and kamil@ pointed out that the commit exists in the ZFS on FreeBSD repository too. https://github.com/zfsonfreebsd/ZoF/commit/928e8ad47d3478a3d5d01f0dd6ae74a9371af65e Which was pointed out as the upstream from which current implementation of NetBSD's ZFS was taken. > This seems to be hard to figure out. Is there someplace in the tree > that says what our upsream is, and what theirs is, and how all of the > various trees out there relate? And how we should be sending things, > and getting things? > > I tried to figure this out, and ended up with > > http://wiki.netbsd.org/zfs/ > > which has lots of \todo statements. -- Santhosh
