In article <ylwtlsapbfxoe...@bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:20:24PM -0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <yllbslviz+qoi...@bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger ><jo...@bec.de> wrote: >> >On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:17:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> >> Module Name: src >> >> Committed By: christos >> >> Date: Thu Jun 3 20:17:37 UTC 2021 >> >> >> >> Modified Files: >> >> src/tests/lib/csu: h_ifunc_static.c >> >> >> >> Log Message: >> >> PR/56230: Jan-Benedict Glaw: arm oabi does not and will not have ifunc >> >support. >> > >> >As I mentioned elsewhere, I disagree with this change. OABI is dead and >> >only really support for legacy compatibility. All the OABI build >> >variants should be removed and this is strongly a step in the wrong >> >direction. >> >> I think it is better to do it after the 10 branch. It is not just removing >> the build.sh targets, we need to remove the compat glue and fix the sets, >> and perhaps something else I am missing. I will revert the two changes >> once we remove all oabi support. > >I don't see how that's related. I'm not talking about removing the >compat layer right now. Remove the build.sh targets and call it a day.
CC:ed tech-toolchain. Does everyone agree to remove the oabi build targets? christos
