On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 08:04:49PM +0000, Roland Illig wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: rillig > Date: Fri Jan 7 20:04:49 UTC 2022 > > Modified Files: > src/usr.bin/make: for.c > > Log Message: > make: use simpler code for handling .for loops
This seems backwards to me. For simpler logic I would expect computing the var length first and then skipping variables that don't have the same length, falling back to memcmp otherwise. De facto inlining a memcmp loop is not an improvement. Joerg
