On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 11:50:15AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 12:04:58AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > Personally, I prefer the use of the C extension in cases like this. The > > "portable" version is less readable... > > I would prefer the type correct C++ style variant (and making lint deal > with it, if it doesn't yet). At least gcc is happy with it.
Ah, never mind - the inline function is void already - so effectively I agree with Jörg. Martin