Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote: > jo...@bec.de said: > | I'd actually weasle out a bit > > Yes, I would too, but
A full set of examples strikes me as too much here still, and I do like the idea of weaseling out. Perhaps: This normalization is done in order from tm_sec up to tm_year, possibly leading to cascading values. That is, a tm_sec value of e.g., 185 with a tm_min value of 58 could lead to an increment of tm_min by three, and thus further incrementing tm_hour by one, and so on. Likewise, negative values can lead to decrementing other tm(3) fields. As with most things relating to time, dates, and calendars, the full details of these side effects are often non‐obvious, and it may be best to avoid such scenarios. ? -Jan
