> I was changing news68k specific code, thus wasn't treating them as > common. But I understand the point.
there's a *LOT* of m68k code that is copied into all the ports that is almost identical, and should really be shared, but it not, and changes like can make this harder to share. ie, while it might appear news68k specific, ideally most of it would end up in arch/m68k instead. it would really be far better for that merge, than to worry about obscure compile options -- there's a real cost when we have platform changes to make, and 10 m68k copies are needed instead of 1. we've done some of this over time (for not just m68k) but there's quite a lot of left here.. thanks. .mrg.