> On May 19, 2024, at 9:19 PM, Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 19, 2024, at 5:35 PM, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 19, 2024, at 3:25 PM, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> src/sys/compat/common: compat_110_mod.c sys_decrip_110.c
>>>> src/sys/compat/netbsd32: netbsd32_compat_110.c
>>>> src/sys/conf: compat_netbsd110.config
>>>> src/sys/modules/compat_110: Makefile
>>>> src/sys/modules/compat_netbsd32_110: Makefile
>>>
>>> Wait, why is there now a compat_110 module? netbsd-11 isn’t out yet.
>>> dup3() belongs in the compat_100 module.
>>
>> You asked for the syscall to be called dup3110 so I put it in compat_110...
>
> The new system call is dup3110 (“dup3 for 11.0”), the old one is “netbsd-10
> compatibility”, so belongs in compat_10.
>
We discussed it with Taylor and decided to call it dup3100 after all since we've
already followed the old scheme for kevent100 and it is better to be consistent
for the 11 release.We can start calling new syscalls 12 after 11 is released.
christos
