thanks! christos
> On Jul 16, 2025, at 9:43 PM, Nat Sloss <nathanialsl...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > Hi Christos, > > (I've CC'd mrg and rin on this email also) > >> Is that a permanent thing? Should it be mentioned in HACKS? Is it a compiler >> bug? > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I hope it's not permanent I'll will check this against the latest version of > GCC when it's been added to the tree. > > I believe this is the same issue as metioned in hacks for libXfont2 (while it > pertains to strsuftoll - which uses strncpy internally which is the same in > this case). > > I'm hoping to pigyback the existing hacks entry and have written to Rin and > Matthew about it - just waiting to see their thoughts on this. > > Hopefully with the GCC update this is no longer necessary. I will check when > that happens. > > Best regards, > > Nat > > > -- > This message has been 'sanitized'. This means that potentially > dangerous content has been rewritten or removed. The following > log describes which actions were taken. > > Sanitizer (start="1752716624"): > Split unusually long word(s) in header. > SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.txt", mimetype="Text/Plain"): > Match (names="unnamed.txt", rule="9"): > Enforced policy: accept > > Total modifications so far: 1 > > > Anomy 0.0.0 : Sanitizer.pm > $Id: Sanitizer.pm,v 1.94 2006/01/02 16:43:10 bre Exp $
