Module Name:    src
Committed By:   dbj
Date:           Sat Feb  6 16:02:16 UTC 2021

Modified Files:
        src/usr.bin/tsort: tsort.c

Log Message:
tsort: fix typo in comment


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.25 -r1.26 src/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
diff -u src/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c:1.25 src/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c:1.26
--- src/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c:1.25	Mon Aug 17 16:26:03 2020
+++ src/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c	Sat Feb  6 16:02:16 2021
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08/17 16:26:03 christos Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.26 2021/02/06 16:02:16 dbj Exp $	*/
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1989, 1993, 1994
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ __COPYRIGHT("@(#) Copyright (c) 1989, 19
 #if 0
 static char sccsid[] = "@(#)tsort.c	8.3 (Berkeley) 5/4/95";
 #endif
-__RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08/17 16:26:03 christos Exp $");
+__RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.26 2021/02/06 16:02:16 dbj Exp $");
 #endif /* not lint */
 
 #include <sys/types.h>
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ __RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08
  *
  *  Should be compatible with AT&T tsort HOWEVER the output is not identical
  *  (i.e. for most graphs there is more than one sorted order, and this tsort
- *  usually generates a different one then the AT&T tsort).  Also, cycle
+ *  usually generates a different one than the AT&T tsort).  Also, cycle
  *  reporting seems to be more accurate in this version (the AT&T tsort
  *  sometimes says a node is in a cycle when it isn't).
  *

Reply via email to