Module Name:    src
Committed By:   rillig
Date:           Sun Feb 21 14:49:23 UTC 2021

Modified Files:
        src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: msg_186.c msg_186.exp

Log Message:
lint: add test for bit-field initialisation in traditional C


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.exp

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.c:1.2	Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.c	Sun Feb 21 14:49:23 2021
@@ -1,7 +1,19 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: msg_186.c,v 1.2 2021/02/21 09:07:58 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: msg_186.c,v 1.3 2021/02/21 14:49:23 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "msg_186.c"
 
-// Test for message: bit-field initialisation is illegal in traditional C [186]
+/* Test for message: bit-field initialisation is illegal in traditional C [186] */
 
-TODO: "Add example code that triggers the above message." /* expect: 249 */
-TODO: "Add example code that almost triggers the above message."
+/* lint1-flags: -tw */
+
+struct bit_field {
+	unsigned one: 1;
+	unsigned three: 3;
+	unsigned two: 2;
+};
+
+struct bit_field bit_field = {
+	1,
+	3.0,			/* expect: 186 */
+	2
+};
+/* XXX: The message is misleading.  Initialisation using integers is ok. */

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.exp:1.1 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.exp:1.2
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.exp:1.1	Sat Jan  2 10:22:43 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_186.exp	Sun Feb 21 14:49:23 2021
@@ -1 +1,8 @@
-msg_186.c(6): syntax error ':' [249]
+(1): warning: 'long double' is illegal in traditional C [266]
+(1): warning: function prototypes are illegal in traditional C [270]
+(2): warning: 'long double' is illegal in traditional C [266]
+(2): warning: function prototypes are illegal in traditional C [270]
+(3): warning: 'long double' is illegal in traditional C [266]
+(3): warning: 'long double' is illegal in traditional C [266]
+(3): warning: function prototypes are illegal in traditional C [270]
+msg_186.c(16): warning: bit-field initialisation is illegal in traditional C [186]

Reply via email to