Module Name: src
Committed By: rillig
Date: Mon Jul 5 19:43:29 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: expr_range.c
Log Message:
tests/lint: fix typos in comment in expr_range
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c
Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.
Modified files:
Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c:1.2 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c:1.3
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c:1.2 Sat May 15 19:12:14 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_range.c Mon Jul 5 19:43:29 2021
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
-/* $NetBSD: expr_range.c,v 1.2 2021/05/15 19:12:14 rillig Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: expr_range.c,v 1.3 2021/07/05 19:43:29 rillig Exp $ */
# 3 "expr_range.c"
/*
* In a switch statement that has (expr & constant) as the controlling
- * expression, complain if one of the case branches is unreachable because
- * the case label does can never match the controlling expression.
+ * expression, complain if a case branch is unreachable because the case
+ * label can never match the controlling expression.
*
* GCC 10 does not complain about the unreachable branch. It knows that the
- * branch is unreachable though since it doesn't generate any code for it.
+ * branch is unreachable though, since it doesn't generate any code for it.
* GCC once had the option -Wunreachable-code, but that option was made a
* no-op in 2011.
*
