Module Name:    src
Committed By:   rillig
Date:           Tue Aug  3 20:46:10 UTC 2021

Modified Files:
        src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: d_c99_union_cast.c d_c99_union_cast.exp

Log Message:
tests/lint: prepare non-GCC test for union casts


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.exp

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.c
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.c:1.5 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.c:1.6
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.c:1.5	Tue Aug  3 20:34:23 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.c	Tue Aug  3 20:46:10 2021
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: d_c99_union_cast.c,v 1.5 2021/08/03 20:34:23 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: d_c99_union_cast.c,v 1.6 2021/08/03 20:46:10 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "d_c99_union_cast.c"
 
 /* C99 does not define union cast, it is a GCC extension. */
 
+/* lint1-flags: -Sw */
+
 struct bar {
 	int a;
 	int b;
@@ -14,9 +16,11 @@ union foo {
 };
 
 void
-foo(void)
+foo(struct bar *a)
 {
-	struct bar *a;		/* expect: 192 */
-
-	((union foo)a).a;
+	/* TODO: warn about union casts in general */
+	a = ((union foo)a).a;
+	/* expect+1: error: type 'pointer to char' is not a member of 'union foo' [329] */
+	a = ((union foo)"string");
+	a->a++;
 }

Index: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.exp
diff -u src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.exp:1.4 src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.exp:1.5
--- src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.exp:1.4	Fri Apr  9 20:12:00 2021
+++ src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/d_c99_union_cast.exp	Tue Aug  3 20:46:10 2021
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d_c99_union_cast.c(19): warning: 'a' unused in function 'foo' [192]
+d_c99_union_cast.c(24): error: type 'pointer to char' is not a member of 'union foo' [329]

Reply via email to